Corporate governance | ESG Investing | Wealth Management

What is the "G" in ESG?

The "G" in ESG stands for "governance" and refers to whether a company manages its business in a responsible way.

Corporate governance

 

Corporate governance is concerned with how companies interact with the full range of external stakeholders, including competitors, suppliers, shareholders and governments.

 

It is, in some ways the most established of the three pillars of ESG investing, because many of the governance factors focus on questions that investors have always considered. The principle of ‘investor stewardship’ is that investors should engage with companies to encourage them to improve their governance.

 

Better corporate governance is often associated with higher and more sustainable returns for shareholders.

Good governance redefined

 

The analysis of corporate governance has expanded beyond shareholder rights to include many other governance factors and in particular those that affect a company’s interactions with competitors, suppliers and governments.

 

Investors should expect the governance element of ESG investing to continue to evolve to reflect changing attitudes, with an increased focus on improved governance in many regions being one way of ensuring that companies meet their responsibilities on environmental and social issues. 

 

More generally, governance in terms of the balance of power between corporate stakeholders will also have to be balanced against overall political and policy priorities at a national and regional level.

Governance in business: a brief history

 

Before the 20th Century: Concerns about the power of companies and the need to ensure that they act responsibly are nothing new. In the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries, trading companies such as the Dutch East India Company and the British East India Company – which were effectively the world’s first multinational corporations – quickly came under scrutiny and laws were eventually instated to curb their powers.

 

The dawn of regulation: However, this was an ad hoc response to specific circumstances, rather than a consistent framework for ensuring companies serve the interests of society. The modern approach to regulating businesses arguably began in the late 19th century when the US passed the first legislation – the Sherman Antitrust Act (1890) – to control the growing monopolistic power of large dominant conglomerates known as corporate trusts. Many other major economies embraced similar laws to promote competition during the 20th century.

 

The early 20th Century: After the Great Crash of 1929, the focus of regulation in the US shifted to the problem of ensuring that companies provided accurate financial information and that controlling shareholders could not openly cheat minority investors or manipulate markets, with the passing of the Securities Act (1933) and the Securities Exchange Act (1934).

 

Higher standards in the 1970s: Governance became less of a priority in the post-war economic boom and it was not until a fresh economic crisis in the 1970s that the Securities and Exchange Commission began to tackle many issues of financial reporting and corporate accountability to shareholders. In 1976, the term “corporate governance” first appeared in the Federal Register, the official journal of the US government, and in the same year listed companies were first required to have an audit committee composed of independent directors. Governments in Europe began to embrace similar principles in the 1990s, generally in response to scandals and crisis in their own markets. The UK’s Cadbury Report (1992), for example, set out new recommendations on the structure of company boards and accounting systems.

 

Investor stewardship in the 21st century: The Cadbury report helped inform voluntary codes from a range of international bodies such as the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and statutory legislation in many countries. The idea that investors should actively exercise their powers to hold companies to account also led to the concept of “investor stewardship” – engaging with companies to encourage them to improve their governance – which is a central part of sustainable investing.

In Europe, Middle East and Africa as well as in Asia Pacific this material is considered marketing material, but this is not the case in the U.S. The value of an investment can fall as well as rise and you might not get back the amount originally invested at any point in time. Your capital may be at risk.

No assurance can be given that any forecast or target can be achieved. Forecasts are based on assumptions, estimates, opinions and hypothetical models which may prove to be incorrect. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. Performance refers to a nominal value based on price gains/losses and does not take into account inflation. Inflation will have a negative impact on the purchasing power of this nominal monetary value. Depending on the current level of inflation, this may lead to a real loss in value, even if the nominal performance of the investment is positive.

This web page is not an offer to buy a security or enter into any transaction. The products, services, information and/or materials contained within these web pages may not be available for residents of certain jurisdictions. Please consider the sales restrictions relating to the products or services in question for further information. Deutsche Bank does not give tax or legal advice; prospective investors should seek advice from their own tax advisers and/or lawyers before entering into any investment.

ESG is an acronym that stands for Environment, Social, Governance. Our ESG framework takes into account applicable regulations and is assessed and updated continually, plus guiding principles developed in-house based on Deutsche Bank’s values and beliefs.

There is currently a lack of uniform criteria and a common market standard for the assessment and classification of financial services and financial products as sustainable. This can lead to different providers assessing the sustainability of financial services and financial products differently.

In addition, there are various new regulations on ESG and Sustainable Finance, which need to be substantiated, and further draft regulations are currently being developed, which may lead to financial services and financial products currently labelled as sustainable not meeting future legal requirements for qualification as sustainable.

We utilize data as well as ESG assessment methodologies that are supplied by independent third-party provider(s). These third-party assessment methodologies and corresponding ratings are therefore subject to change, which may result in turnover in investments within a portfolio to remain in line with an agreed ESG baseline.

ESG ratings are not currently regulated. Therefore, it is important to note that there is a selection of such data providers in the market, and methodologies between these can vary leading to different ratings for the same instruments.

ESG principles may result in a less diversified, more concentrated portfolio. ESG investing may result in the exclusion of specific industries.

Explore further

Find out more about how we can help and the ESG investing services we offer in your region.